The Limited Test Ban Agreement

"The Limited Test Ban Agreement: Emergence of New
 Knowledge Structures in International Negotiation"

       Matt Bonham collaborated in this research with Victor Sergeev and Pavel Parshin to analyze cognitive maps constructed from exchanges
       between President Kennedy and Premier Khrushchev on the test-ban negotiations. A comparison of the negotiations over time reveals the
       emergence of new knowledge structures that were hypothesized to facilitate the 1963 agreement on nuclear testing. To complete this
       research, Matt and his colleagues had to develop a framework for investigating the ontological pre-understandings that lie behind political
       texts and develop new coding rules, called "processual coding," to code the holistic views that lie behind many Soviet texts.

       The framework for the analysis, which was developed by the authors in the early 1990s, is summarized briefly below, along with audio
       excerpts of discussions with Victor Sergeev, which took place in Moscow in December 1990. These conversations became the basis of "The
       Limited Test-Ban Agreement: Emergence of New Knowledge Structures in International Negotiation," International Studies Quarterly
      
 (1997) 41, 215-240.

       Finally, illustrations of the processual and procedural codings of the texts of the limited test ban negotiations are shown for Khrushchev and
       Kennedy.



A Typology of Ontological Pre-Understandings



         Three types of ontological pre-understandings, each leading to a different representation of knowledge, can be identified:


        1. The nominalistic view is based on a one-level, purely "surface" ontology that divides the world into simple "atomic" objects. This view
            attempts of understand the behavior of others as a reaction to an immediate stimulus, with no structural relations between objects.

This view results in texts that attempt understand political activity in behavioristic terms.

2. The holistic view reflects an ontology of the world that differentiates surface events from internal processes, which are hidden and
     not understandable. The internal processes are considered to be extremely complex things that have a certain "inner life."

The holistic pre-understanding produces a "processual representation" of political activity.

3. The structural view takes into account patterned relations between objects. Relations between states of affairs are described in terms
    of causal linkages; for example, event A prevents event B.

This view produces a "procedural representation" of the world whereby change is the result of structured and deliberately ordered actions.

The Moscow Discussions on the Typology of Pre-Understanding

          Here are audio excerpts of discussions between Victor Sergeev and Matt Bonham about a
        typology of pre-understanding. The discussions, which took place in Moscow in December
        1990, became the basis of "The Limited Test-Ban Agreement: Emergence of New Knowledge
        Structures in International Negotiation,"
International Studies Quartery (1997) 41, 215-240.

The application of cognitive mapping to represent Russian texts

"When we started our study of cognitive mapping...." 710KB

What is an Ontological Pre-Understanding?

"A pre-understanding is a kind of cognitive structure, but it is not an individual cognitive structure...." 1,050KB

"A pre-understanding is cognitive structure that in terms of artifical intelligence is a kind of "diamond"...." 695KB

The Holistic View and Processual Thinking

"I tried to understand the semantic nature of processual thinking...." 533KB

"Second is the holistic point of view...." 607KB

The Representation of Holistic Texts

"It is possible to represent the text as a combination of processes and states [of affair]...." 356KB


Examples of Processual and Procedual Representations

Figure 1. Prototypical example of a processual frame.

Figure 2. Khrushchev's radio-TV address, June 15, 1961.

Figure 3. Khrushchev's radio-TV address, June 15, 1961, continued.

Figure 4A. Khrushchev's radio-TV address, June 15, 1961, continued.

Figure 4B. Khrushchev's radio-TV address, June 15, 1961, continued (a representation that looks "very simple).

Figure 8. Interview with Premier Khrushchev, June 1963.

Figure 9. Interview with Premier Khrushchev, June 1963, continued.

Figure 10. Address by President Kennedy at the American University, June 10, 1963.

Figure 11. Address by President Kennedy at the American University, June 10, 1963, continued.