Alasdair Roberts, associate professor of public
administration, began studying government secrecy in 1997 at what he calls an
"extraordinary moment in history:" a time when open government laws, modeled
after the U.S. Freedom of Information Act of 1966, spread around the world at an
unprecedented rate. To date, more than 60 countries have adopted
right-to-information laws, and Roberts has traveled extensively—from his native
Canada to Brazil, Switzerland, and India—to gauge the progress of this global
movement.
But as Roberts makes clear in his new book, Blacked Out:
Government Secrecy in the Information Age (Cambridge), the last decade has not
been a simple march toward transparency—especially in the years since the 9/11
attacks. "Outside the United States, especially before 2001, the story was all
about the advance of openness," says Roberts, who has degrees in both law and
public policy. "And then, after 2001, there has been a huge debate in the United
States about government secrecy, which is pulling in the opposite direction."
In Blacked Out, Roberts analyzes the current Bush
administration's "retreat from openness" and argues that it has been neither as
effective nor as far-reaching as critics have suggested. Much more problematic,
according to Roberts, is the fact that "the very structure of government is
changing in ways that undermine transparency." He points to three key areas of
change: privatization, which shifts government functions to private entities
that may not be subject to the same disclosure laws; intelligence and police
networks that have proliferated since 9/11 and, Roberts says, "share information
in ways that make it more difficult to get information if you're on the outside";
and the rise of supranational institutions, such as the World Trade Organization
and the European Union, that are "making policy decisions national governments
used to make." In addition, Roberts describes how the digitization of government
data can both empower seekers of information and make their task infinitely more
complicated.
One measure of the evenhandedness of Roberts' analysis
is that Blacked Out has been praised by both right-to-information advocates and
by government insiders. Aryeh Neier of the Open Society Institute called the
book a "fast-paced, well-informed, and engrossing account of the emergence of a
worldwide movement to hold governments accountable," while former CIA lawyer
Elizabeth Rindskopf Parker wrote (in I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the
Information Society) that Blacked Out is a "tour de force . . . a book important
for anyone concerned with the history and future challenges for government
information access at a time of fundamental change."
In the summer of 2006 the Freedom of Information Act
turned 40. Plus, Roberts notes that March 2007 is the 10th anniversary of
another milestone in the open-government movement: the 1997 report by the U.S.
Senate's Commission on Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy, spearheaded
by the late senator and Maxwell professor Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Moynihan went
on to publish the best-selling book Secrecy, which Roberts calls "really
prescient. He said that governments which are too secretive can shoot themselves
in the foot. If you put too much emphasis on secrecy, you undermine your own
ability to make intelligent policy decisions, which arguably is what happened
before 9/11 and before the war in Iraq."
Perhaps the most troubling question raised by Roberts in
Blacked Out is whether the American public, bombarded every day by
information—trivial and vital; true, false, and in between—will pay sufficient
attention to revelations about government to act on them. "You can see how in
the rush of everyday life, it would be easy and convenient to say, 'This is too
complicated. It's too hard. It's too confusing. I don't have time to delve into
this and sort out what the facts are, and as a consequence I'm just going to
check out,'" Roberts says. "That's an alarming prospect. If people get into that
frame of mind, transparency is irrelevant.
—Jeffrey Pepper Rodgers