By Laurel Saiz
A rural province of the Philippines slashes its poverty rate from 52 to 4.2
percent in only 12 years. Citizens are included in decision making about
development plans and budgets, and indigenous peoples are welcomed as partners
in the management of their forests and watershed. A variety of public, private,
and nongovernmental organizations come together to start day-care centers.
Sherman County, Oregon, builds a 24-megawatt wind farm, nestled amid numerous
winter wheat farms. The sites were selected through a consensus-based process
with diverse local leaders and citizens.
The State of Wisconsin assures the long-term survival of the endangered Karner
blue butterfly, which is dependent on the wild lupine plant across its habitat
range. Representatives from utilities, the forest product industry, governments
at every level, and environmentalists develop the habitat plan.
These successful initiatives—domestic and international, large and seemingly
small—are examples of effective collaborative governance, a larger, umbrella
term for collaborative public management and participatory governance. It’s a
field undergoing an explosion of new developments with broad implications.
Last fall, leaders in collaborative governance gathered in Washington, D.C., for
a three-day conference that served as the kick-off for PARC’s new “Collaborative
Governance Initiative.” Being launched during PARC’s 20th anniversary year, the
effort promotes new knowledge and understanding about collaborative public
management, deliberative democracy, and civic engagement. Papers from the
conference are being published in book form by Georgetown University Press and
in special issues of the Public Administration Review (PAR) and the
International Public Management Journal.
In their introduction to the PAR issue, PARC co-directors Rosemary O’Leary and
Catherine Gerard, and Lisa Blomgren Bingham (a PARC honorary senior research
fellow and faculty member at Indiana University) define collaborative public
management as “facilitating and operating in multiorganizational arrangements to
solve problems that cannot be solved or easily solved by single organizations.”
When public organizations and public officials are involved, it often
encompasses “the active involve ment of citizens in government decision
making.”
“The whole philosophy,” O’Leary says, “is that the individuals at the table—the
stakeholders—are the experts in terms of the solution. We are experts at
process. It’s not for us to impress a solution on them. With an emphasis on
collaborative public management and participatory governance, you can’t say that
life will always be great and you’ll have no more conflicts, but it often is a
giant step toward an enduring resolution to the conflict.”
“We assembled the top 40 practitioners and scholars in the country,” says
O’Leary of last fall’s conference. “We had the scholars present their research
and we then asked them the ‘So what?’ question. Given changes in governance, and
government—given the growth of networks in public organizations—what does this
mean in terms of the education of students? Basically, their conclusion was that
we should be teaching negotiation, collaboration, and collaborative problem
solving.”