BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:Vision\, Voice\, and Technology: Is There a Global "Open Govern
 ment" Trend? Sabina Schnell\,&nbsp\;Assistant Professor of Public Administ
 ration and International Affairs.“Open government” is being hailed as a ne
 w governance paradigm. But while everybody pays lip-service to it\, are go
 vernments around the world becoming more open? I look at changes in both t
 he meaning and the practice of government openness around the world in the
  last decades. A few main trends are identified. First\, the technological
  meaning of openness is increasingly supplanting the rights-based understa
 nding of it. Second\, even though more and more countries are joining glob
 al transparency and openness initiatives\, global averages on budget trans
 parency or open data have barely budged. Third\, while autocracies are cat
 ching up to democracies in terms of using online tools to inform and consu
 lt citizens\, we see an incipient democratic rollback around the world\, i
 ncluding a shrinking space for civil society. Yet\, the most significant c
 hanges in government transparency (“vision”) and citizen participation (“v
 oice”) have gone hand-in-hand with processes of democratization. I conclud
 e that\, if we narrow down government openness to a set of tools and techn
 ologies used at will\, as opposed to a set of legally embedded rights that
  guarantee access to information and participation independent of who is i
 n power\, we risk ending up with governments that are more closed rather t
 han more open to genuine societal inputs.&nbsp\;Conversations in Conflict 
 Studies is a weekly educational speaker series for students\, faculty\, an
 d the community. The series\, sponsored by PARCC\, draws its speakers from
  Syracuse University faculty\, national and international scholars and act
 ivists\, and PhD students. Pizza is served. Follow us on Twitter @PARCCatM
 axwell\, tweet #ConvoInConflict.If you require accommodations\, please con
 tact Deborah Toole by email at datoole@syr.edu or by phone at 315.443.2367
 .&nbsp\;
DTEND:20180207T184500Z
DTSTAMP:20260510T225800Z
DTSTART:20180207T174500Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Conversations in Conflict Studies with Professor Sabina Schnell
UID:RFCALITEM639140362807068436
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p><strong>Vision\, Voice\, and Technology: Is
  There a Global "Open Government" Trend?</strong> </p><p><em>Sabina Schnel
 l\,&nbsp\;Assistant Professor of Public Administration and International A
 ffairs.</em></p><p>“Open government” is being hailed as a new governance p
 aradigm. But while everybody pays lip-service to it\, are governments arou
 nd the world becoming more open? I look at changes in both the meaning and
  the practice of government openness around the world in the last decades.
  A few main trends are identified. First\, the technological meaning of op
 enness is increasingly supplanting the rights-based understanding of it. S
 econd\, even though more and more countries are joining global transparenc
 y and openness initiatives\, global averages on budget transparency or ope
 n data have barely budged. Third\, while autocracies are catching up to de
 mocracies in terms of using online tools to inform and consult citizens\, 
 we see an incipient democratic rollback around the world\, including a shr
 inking space for civil society. Yet\, the most significant changes in gove
 rnment transparency (“vision”) and citizen participation (“voice”) have go
 ne hand-in-hand with processes of democratization. I conclude that\, if we
  narrow down government openness to a set of tools and technologies used a
 t will\, as opposed to a set of legally embedded rights that guarantee acc
 ess to information and participation independent of who is in power\, we r
 isk ending up with governments that are more closed rather than more open 
 to genuine societal inputs.<br>&nbsp\;</p><p>Conversations in Conflict Stu
 dies is a weekly educational speaker series for students\, faculty\, and t
 he community. The series\, sponsored by PARCC\, draws its speakers from Sy
 racuse University faculty\, national and international scholars and activi
 sts\, and PhD students. Pizza is served. Follow us on Twitter @PARCCatMaxw
 ell\, tweet #ConvoInConflict.<br><br><em>If you require accommodations\, p
 lease contact Deborah Toole by email at datoole@syr.edu or by phone at 315
 .443.2367.&nbsp\;</em></p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
