BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:Trolling\, dunking and persuading: what is ‘good\nfaith’ debate
  in the social media era?&nbsp\;Presented by Regina Rini\, York University
  (Toronto)\n&nbsp\;\n\nSocial media is usually a bad place for debating im
 portant public policy\nissues. Many interactions are&nbsp\;obviously in ba
 d faith\, from trolls to\nautomated bots. But if we want to do better\, we
  first need to know&nbsp\;what\ngood faith debate should be – and that tur
 ns out to be hard to describe. In\nthis talk I evaluate&nbsp\;several prop
 osals for ‘good faith’ debate\, showing\nproblems with each. I build a mod
 el of good faith&nbsp\;debate as a cooperative-adversarial\nprocess\, and 
 use this model to explain why existing social media&nbsp\;platforms\ntend 
 to perform so poorly.\n\nhttps://syracuseuniversity.zoom.us/j/92076682248?
 pwd=T2JDSTRLTWlUWlBSTmh3TkVxZkd5UT09\n&nbsp\;\nMeeting ID: 920 7668 2248\n
 Passcode: 039156\n\nSponsored by the Autonomous Systems Policy InstituteFo
 r more information\, please contact Johannes Himmelreich at&nbsp\;jrhimmel
 @syr.edu\n\n
DTEND:20210414T200000Z
DTSTAMP:20260512T230343Z
DTSTART:20210414T190000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:ASPI Speaker Series: AI and Democratic Values
UID:RFCALITEM639142094236117841
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p><b>Trolling\, dunking and persuading: what 
 is ‘good\nfaith’ debate in the social media era?&nbsp\;</b></p><p>Presente
 d by Regina Rini\, York University (Toronto)<br>\n&nbsp\;\n<br>\nSocial me
 dia is usually a bad place for debating important public policy\nissues. M
 any interactions are&nbsp\;obviously in bad faith\, from trolls to\nautoma
 ted bots. But if we want to do better\, we first need to know&nbsp\;what\n
 good faith debate should be – and that turns out to be hard to describe. I
 n\nthis talk I evaluate&nbsp\;several proposals for ‘good faith’ debate\, 
 showing\nproblems with each. I build a model of good faith&nbsp\;debate as
  a cooperative-adversarial\nprocess\, and use this model to explain why ex
 isting social media&nbsp\;platforms\ntend to perform so poorly.<br>\n<br>\
 n<a href="https://syracuseuniversity.zoom.us/j/92076682248?">https://syrac
 useuniversity.zoom.us/j/92076682248?</a>pwd=T2JDSTRLTWlUWlBSTmh3TkVxZkd5UT
 09<br>\n&nbsp\;<br>\nMeeting ID: 920 7668 2248<br>\nPasscode: 039156<br>\n
 <br>\n<br></p><p><em>Sponsored by the Autonomous Systems Policy Institute<
 /em></p><p>For more information\, please contact Johannes Himmelreich at&n
 bsp\;jrhimmel@syr.edu</p><p><br>\n<br>\n</p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR