BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:Trade Development and Political Economy Present: Jennifer P. Po
 oleTrade and Labor Reallocation with Heterogeneous Enforcement of Labor Re
 gulationsAuthors: Rita K. Almeida and Jennifer P. PooleSpeaker: Jennifer P
 . Poole (University of California\, Santa Cruz)Abstract: This paper revisi
 ts the question of how trade openness affects labor market outcomes in a d
 eveloping country setting. The authors explore the fact that plants face v
 arying degrees of exposure to global markets and to the enforcement of lab
 or market regulations\, and rely on Brazil’s currency crisis in 1999 as an
  exogenous source of variation in industry-specific real exchange rates an
 d hence\, access to foreign markets. Using administrative data on employer
 s matched to their employees and on the enforcement of labor regulations a
 t the city level over Brazil’s main crisis period\, the authors document t
 hat the way trade openness affects labor market outcomes for plants and wo
 rkers depends on the stringency of de facto labor market regulations. In p
 articular\, the authors&nbsp\; show that after a trade shock plants facing
  stricter enforcement of the labor law decrease job creation and increase 
 job destruction by more than plants facing looser enforcement. Consistent 
 with their predictions\, this effect is strongest among small\, labor-inte
 nsive\, non-exporting plants\, for which labor regulations are most bindin
 g. The authors also note a stronger impact of enforcement on younger worke
 rs. Finally\, their findings are consistent with the hypothesis that incre
 ased regulatory enforcement limits the plant-level productivity gains asso
 ciated with trade openness. The latter implies that increasing the flexibi
 lity of de jure regulations will allow for broader access to the gains fro
 m trade.Short Bio: Jennifer Poole is an Assistant Professor of Economics a
 t the University of California\, Santa Cruz.&nbsp\; Her research interests
  include international trade\, applied microeconomics\, and Latin American
  development. Her work has been published in the Review of Economics and S
 tatistics and in World Development.
DTEND:20130325T210000Z
DTSTAMP:20260306T060429Z
DTSTART:20130325T200000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Trade Development and Political Economy present: Jennifer P. Poole
UID:RFCALITEM639083558698907322
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:Trade Development and Political Economy Presen
 t: Jennifer P. Poole<br>Trade and Labor Reallocation with Heterogeneous En
 forcement of Labor Regulations<br><br>Authors: Rita K. Almeida and Jennife
 r P. Poole<br><br>Speaker: Jennifer P. Poole (University of California\, S
 anta Cruz)<br><br>Abstract: This paper revisits the question of how trade 
 openness affects labor market outcomes in a developing country setting. Th
 e authors explore the fact that plants face varying degrees of exposure to
  global markets and to the enforcement of labor market regulations\, and r
 ely on Brazil’s currency crisis in 1999 as an exogenous source of variatio
 n in industry-specific real exchange rates and hence\, access to foreign m
 arkets. Using administrative data on employers matched to their employees 
 and on the enforcement of labor regulations at the city level over Brazil’
 s main crisis period\, the authors document that the way trade openness af
 fects labor market outcomes for plants and workers depends on the stringen
 cy of de facto labor market regulations. In particular\, the authors&nbsp\
 ; show that after a trade shock plants facing stricter enforcement of the 
 labor law decrease job creation and increase job destruction by more than 
 plants facing looser enforcement. Consistent with their predictions\, this
  effect is strongest among small\, labor-intensive\, non-exporting plants\
 , for which labor regulations are most binding. The authors also note a st
 ronger impact of enforcement on younger workers. Finally\, their findings 
 are consistent with the hypothesis that increased regulatory enforcement l
 imits the plant-level productivity gains associated with trade openness. T
 he latter implies that increasing the flexibility of de jure regulations w
 ill allow for broader access to the gains from trade.<br><br>Short Bio: Je
 nnifer Poole is an Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of C
 alifornia\, Santa Cruz.&nbsp\; Her research interests include internationa
 l trade\, applied microeconomics\, and Latin American development. Her wor
 k has been published in the Review of Economics and Statistics and in Worl
 d Development.<br><br>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
