BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:Political\nNorms&nbsp\;for&nbsp\;Deliberation in&nbsp\;the&nbsp
 \;Digital Age\, presented by Fabienne\nPeter\, University&nbsp\;of Warwick
 \n\n&nbsp\;\n\n\nAbstract\n\nLegitimate\npolitical decision-making is unde
 rpinned by well-ordered political\ndeliberation\, including by the&nbsp\;d
 ecision-makers themselves\, their advisory\nbodies\, and the public at lar
 ge. But what constitutes well-ordered political\ndeliberation? With the in
 creasing importance of social media for political\ndebate\, this&nbsp\;que
 stion has gained new prominence. The short answer to this\nquestion is tha
 t well-ordered political&nbsp\;deliberation is governed by\nrelevant norms
 . In my talk\, I first discuss different types of norms that\nmight&nbsp\;
 govern well-ordered political deliberation. I then focus on one\nparticula
 r type of norms: epistemic norms.&nbsp\;My aim is to shed light on how\nth
 e validity of contributions to political deliberation depends\, inter alia
 \,\non&nbsp\;the epistemic status of the claims made.\n\n&nbsp\;\nhttps://
 syracuseuniversity.zoom.us/j/92076682248?pwd=T2JDSTRLTWlUWlBSTmh3TkVxZkd5U
 T09\n\n&nbsp\;\n\nMeeting\nID: 920 7668 2248\n\nPasscode:\n039156Sponsored
  by the Autonomous Systems Policy InstituteFor more information\, please c
 ontact Johannes Himmelreich at&nbsp\;jrhimmel@syr.edu
DTEND:20210324T200000Z
DTSTAMP:20260512T000922Z
DTSTART:20210324T190000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:ASPI Speaker Series: AI and Democratic Values
UID:RFCALITEM639141269621117789
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p><strong>Political\nNorms&nbsp\;for&nbsp\;De
 liberation in&nbsp\;the&nbsp\;Digital Age</strong>\, presented by Fabienne
 \nPeter\, University&nbsp\;of Warwick\n\n&nbsp\;\n\n</p><p>\nAbstract\n\nL
 egitimate\npolitical decision-making is underpinned by well-ordered politi
 cal\ndeliberation\, including by the&nbsp\;decision-makers themselves\, th
 eir advisory\nbodies\, and the public at large. But what constitutes well-
 ordered political\ndeliberation? With the increasing importance of social 
 media for political\ndebate\, this&nbsp\;question has gained new prominenc
 e. The short answer to this\nquestion is that well-ordered political&nbsp\
 ;deliberation is governed by\nrelevant norms. In my talk\, I first discuss
  different types of norms that\nmight&nbsp\;govern well-ordered political 
 deliberation. I then focus on one\nparticular type of norms: epistemic nor
 ms.&nbsp\;My aim is to shed light on how\nthe validity of contributions to
  political deliberation depends\, inter alia\,\non&nbsp\;the epistemic sta
 tus of the claims made.\n\n&nbsp\;\n</p><p><a href="https://syracuseuniver
 sity.zoom.us/j/92076682248?pwd=T2JDSTRLTWlUWlBSTmh3TkVxZkd5UT09">https://s
 yracuseuniversity.zoom.us/j/92076682248?pwd=T2JDSTRLTWlUWlBSTmh3TkVxZkd5UT
 09</a>\n\n&nbsp\;\n\nMeeting\nID: 920 7668 2248\n\nPasscode:\n039156</p><p
 ><em>Sponsored by the Autonomous Systems Policy Institute</em></p><p>For m
 ore information\, please contact Johannes Himmelreich at&nbsp\;jrhimmel@sy
 r.edu</p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR