BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:The Moynihan Institute’s South Asia Center presents&nbsp\;Sohin
 i Chattopadhyay\, assistant professor of history at Union College.In May 1
 939\, a 20-year-old man died in Bombay’s suburb Vile Parle. He was a migra
 nt worker\, often without a home\, and Dalit. His friends took his body to
  a cremation ground\, but only by trespassing it at night\, since Dalits w
 ere not allowed access to the cremation ground that offered traditional fu
 nerals for dominant caste Hindus. Seemingly unconnected\, the same year\, 
 Legislative Councilmember of Bombay&nbsp\;Purushottam G. Solanki\, with th
 e support of socialist Maniben Kara and theosophist Sophia Wadia\, introdu
 ced the proposal to have a public electric crematorium in the city which w
 ould be accessible to all. This paper links incidents of civil disobedienc
 e\, such as the one in Vile Parle\, to the political and social forces beh
 ind the establishment of Bombay’s first public electric crematorium. By an
 alyzing these acts of resistance within the broader context of labor and&n
 bsp\;anti-caste movements and a simultaneous comfort with new death techno
 logies\, the paper illuminates the complex interplay between public health
  infrastructure\, colonial governance and the struggle for social justice.
  The electric crematorium\, as a response to these tensions\, emerges as b
 oth a symbol of technological progress and a tool for social equality\, hi
 ghlighting the intertwined histories of caste\, technology and urban devel
 opment in colonial Bombay.Sohini Chattopadhyay (she/her) is assistant prof
 essor of history at Union College. Her current book project\, tentatively 
 titled “Dead Labor: Comparative Histories of the Electric Crematorium in C
 olonial Bombay and Calcutta\,” tracks the intersections between technologi
 es and social histories to underscore the connected and divergent patterns
  of urbanization in South Asia. Chattopadhyay&nbsp\;received a Ph.D. in hi
 story from Columbia University in 2023 and holds an M.A. from Jawaharlal N
 ehru University in New Delhi\, India. She was the founding-editor of the w
 eb journal Borderlines and is now developing its advisory board. She frequ
 ently contributes articles on public health\, social policies and South As
 ian history on digital media platforms.
DTEND:20250211T190000Z
DTSTAMP:20260511T205253Z
DTSTART:20250211T173000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:A Subaltern Crematorium of India? Bombay\, 1918 – 1953
UID:RFCALITEM639141151732991317
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>The Moynihan Institute’s South Asia Center 
 presents&nbsp\;Sohini Chattopadhyay\, assistant professor of history at Un
 ion College.</p><p>In May 1939\, a 20-year-old man died in Bombay’s suburb
  Vile Parle. He was a migrant worker\, often without a home\, and Dalit. H
 is friends took his body to a cremation ground\, but only by trespassing i
 t at night\, since Dalits were not allowed access to the cremation ground 
 that offered traditional funerals for dominant caste Hindus. Seemingly unc
 onnected\, the same year\, Legislative Councilmember of Bombay&nbsp\;Purus
 hottam G. Solanki\, with the support of socialist Maniben Kara and theosop
 hist Sophia Wadia\, introduced the proposal to have a public electric crem
 atorium in the city which would be accessible to all. </p><p>This paper li
 nks incidents of civil disobedience\, such as the one in Vile Parle\, to t
 he political and social forces behind the establishment of Bombay’s first 
 public electric crematorium. By analyzing these acts of resistance within 
 the broader context of labor and&nbsp\;anti-caste movements and a simultan
 eous comfort with new death technologies\, the paper illuminates the compl
 ex interplay between public health infrastructure\, colonial governance an
 d the struggle for social justice. The electric crematorium\, as a respons
 e to these tensions\, emerges as both a symbol of technological progress a
 nd a tool for social equality\, highlighting the intertwined histories of 
 caste\, technology and urban development in colonial Bombay.</p><p><strong
 >Sohini Chattopadhyay</strong> (she/her) is assistant professor of history
  at Union College. Her current book project\, tentatively titled “Dead Lab
 or: Comparative Histories of the Electric Crematorium in Colonial Bombay a
 nd Calcutta\,” tracks the intersections between technologies and social hi
 stories to underscore the connected and divergent patterns of urbanization
  in South Asia. </p><p>Chattopadhyay&nbsp\;received a Ph.D. in history fro
 m Columbia University in 2023 and holds an M.A. from Jawaharlal Nehru Univ
 ersity in New Delhi\, India. She was the founding-editor of the web journa
 l Borderlines and is now developing its advisory board. She frequently con
 tributes articles on public health\, social policies and South Asian histo
 ry on digital media platforms.</p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
