BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs&nbsp\;Sovereignty\, Order 
 and Conflict Series presentsCorri Zoli\, Ph. D\, Associate Teaching Profes
 sor\, Institute for Security Policy &amp\; Law\, Syracuse UniversityThe Re
 turn of Sovereignty in International LawEuroscepticism\, anti-immigration 
 sentiments\, fortified borders\, trade barriers\, de-globalization\, falte
 ring international alliances: today\, state sovereignty is resurgent and d
 efensive postures toward national political autonomy are everywhere. They 
 reveal an intense debate over the meaning\, scope\, and consequences of so
 vereignty in relation to international law. Whereas some scholars worry th
 at a return to sovereignty presages the end of the post-World War II liber
 al order\, my new approach posits that sovereignty is in fact the basis fo
 r international law—not its antagonist. After all\, the UN Charter’s sover
 eign equality and noninterference clauses help define the international sy
 stem. Thus\, the return of sovereignty can be seen as an adaptive response
  by states seeking both to rely on international law and to invoke bedrock
  principles of sovereignty in order to manage integrationist pressures\, s
 uch as global trade\, transnational threats\, and intrusive international 
 organizations. An appeal to sovereign preferences is permissible under int
 ernational law so long as it does not evade ratified agreements. This dist
 inction is often lost in scholarship that characterizes resurgent sovereig
 nty as “backsliding” or state intransigence.Sponsored by Moynihan Institut
 e of Global Affairs and&nbsp\;Sovereignty\, Order and Conflict (SOC) For m
 ore information or to request accessibility arrangements\, please contact 
 Juanita Horan at jmhoran@syr.edu.
DTEND:20200127T183000Z
DTSTAMP:20260611T145120Z
DTSTART:20200127T170000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:The Return of Sovereignty in International Law - SOC
UID:RFCALITEM639167718801901740
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs&nbsp\;
 </p><p>Sovereignty\, Order and Conflict Series presents</p><p><br></p><p>C
 orri Zoli\, Ph. D\, Associate Teaching Professor\, Institute for Security 
 Policy &amp\; Law\, Syracuse University</p><p><br></p><p><b>The Return of 
 Sovereignty in International Law</b><br>Euroscepticism\, anti-immigration 
 sentiments\, fortified borders\, trade barriers\, de-globalization\, falte
 ring international alliances: today\, state sovereignty is resurgent and d
 efensive postures toward national political autonomy are everywhere. They 
 reveal an intense debate over the meaning\, scope\, and consequences of so
 vereignty in relation to international law. Whereas some scholars worry th
 at a return to sovereignty presages the end of the post-World War II liber
 al order\, my new approach posits that sovereignty is in fact the basis fo
 r international law—not its antagonist. After all\, the UN Charter’s sover
 eign equality and noninterference clauses help define the international sy
 stem. Thus\, the return of sovereignty can be seen as an adaptive response
  by states seeking both to rely on international law and to invoke bedrock
  principles of sovereignty in order to manage integrationist pressures\, s
 uch as global trade\, transnational threats\, and intrusive international 
 organizations. An appeal to sovereign preferences is permissible under int
 ernational law so long as it does not evade ratified agreements. This dist
 inction is often lost in scholarship that characterizes resurgent sovereig
 nty as “backsliding” or state intransigence.</p><p><br></p><p>Sponsored by
  Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs and&nbsp\;Sovereignty\, Order and Co
 nflict (SOC) </p><p><br></p><p>For more information or to request accessib
 ility arrangements\, please contact Juanita Horan at jmhoran@syr.edu.<br><
 /p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
