BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION: Moynihan Institute of Global AffairsCenter for European Studie
 spresentsPaolo R. Graziano \n\nProfessor\nof Political Science\, Universit
 y of Padova\, Italy\n\nResearch\nAssociate\, European Social Observatory\,
  Brussels\, Belgium\n\nThe End of Social Europe? Understanding EU Social P
 olicy Change (Co-authors: Paolo R.&nbsp\;Graziano and Miriam Hartlapp)The 
 financial and economic crisis has increased attention on EU social policy\
 , yet little policy change has been realized. Drawing on Easton’s politica
 l system approach\,&nbsp\;Graziano and Hartlapp&nbsp\;identify the 2004\, 
 2009 and 2014 European elections and the financial and economic crisis as 
 inputs to the EU political system. On the output side\,&nbsp\;this&nbsp\;t
 alk&nbsp\;shows how social policy has been substantially removed from the 
 priorities of the EU political agenda already prior to the crisis.&nbsp\;G
 raziano and Hartlapp argue that although crisis-generated demand could hav
 e predicted European social policies becoming more relevant in order to co
 pe with the crisis\, support in the form of election results empowered act
 ors interested in deepening economic integration and austerity policies.&n
 bsp\;Graziano and Hartlapp present new empirical data contributing to this
  argument by analyzing how\, inside the “black box” of the EU political sy
 stem\, the changing ideological composition of the Commission and an asymm
 etrical intergovernmentalist turn have been key driver for the substantial
  decline of EU social policy provision.  For more information\, contact Ha
 vva Karakas-Keles\, hkarakas@syr.edu&nbsp\;Sponsoring Department: Center f
 or European Studies\, Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs
DTEND:20180910T223000Z
DTSTAMP:20260510T015351Z
DTSTART:20180910T211500Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:The End of Social Europe? Understanding EU Social Policy Change - C
 ES
UID:RFCALITEM639139604316278601
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p> Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs</p><p
 >Center for European Studies</p><p>presents<br></p><p><br></p><p><b>Paolo 
 R. Graziano</b></p><p> \n\n</p>Professor\nof Political Science\, Universit
 y of Padova\, Italy<p>\n\n</p>Research\nAssociate\, European Social Observ
 atory\, Brussels\, Belgium<p>\n\n</p><p><br></p><p><strong>The End of Soci
 al Europe? Understanding EU Social Policy Change<br><span></span> (Co-auth
 ors: Paolo R.&nbsp\;Graziano and Miriam Hartlapp)</strong></p><p>The finan
 cial and economic crisis has increased attention on EU social policy\, yet
  little policy change has been realized. Drawing on Easton’s political sys
 tem approach\,&nbsp\;Graziano and Hartlapp&nbsp\;identify the 2004\, 2009 
 and 2014 European elections and the financial and economic crisis as input
 s to the EU political system. On the output side\,&nbsp\;this&nbsp\;talk&n
 bsp\;shows how social policy has been substantially removed from the prior
 ities of the EU political agenda already prior to the crisis.&nbsp\;Grazia
 no and Hartlapp argue that although crisis-generated demand could have pre
 dicted European social policies becoming more relevant in order to cope wi
 th the crisis\, support in the form of election results empowered actors i
 nterested in deepening economic integration and austerity policies.&nbsp\;
 Graziano and Hartlapp present new empirical data contributing to this argu
 ment by analyzing how\, inside the “black box” of the EU political system\
 , the changing ideological composition of the Commission and an asymmetric
 al intergovernmentalist turn have been key driver for the substantial decl
 ine of EU social policy provision.<br><span></span> </p><span></span><p><s
 pan></span> </p><span></span><p>For more information\, contact Havva Karak
 as-Keles\, <a href="mailto:hkarakas@syr.edu">hkarakas@syr.edu</a>&nbsp\;</
 p><p>Sponsoring Department: Center for European Studies\, Moynihan Institu
 te of Global Affairs</p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
