BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:The Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs' Comparative Politics/
International Relation Series presents Richard Clark\, assistant professor
of government\, \;Cornell University.When donors extend foreign aid\,
they often attach requirements on how funds can be spent. These requireme
nts are thought to increase aid effectiveness and generate policy reforms
that benefit both the donor and recipient. However\, recipients often perc
eive such conditions to infringe on their sovereignty. How does the public
in recipient countries view requirements attached to development finance?
Richard Clark\, assistant professor of government at Cornell University\,
presents co-authored research that addresses this puzzle. Clark and co-au
thors argue that individuals’ assessment of aid requirements is a joint fu
nction of their trust in their own government and that of the donor countr
y. Analysis of data from the Afrobarometer survey series as well as an ori
ginal survey fielded in Kenya offer support for their contentions.For more
information or to request accessibility arrangements\, please contact Geo
rgios Tsaoussis Carter (gtsaouss@syr.edu)
DTEND:20230203T183000Z
DTSTAMP:20260512T205205Z
DTSTART:20230203T170000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Accountable to Whom? Public Opinion of Aid Conditionality in Recipi
ent Countries
UID:RFCALITEM639142015253863092
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:The Moynihan Institute of Global Affai
rs' Comparative Politics/International Relation Series presents Richard Cl
ark\, assistant professo
r of government\, \;Cornell University.
When donors exten
d foreign aid\, they often attach requirements on how funds can be spent.
These requirements are thought to increase aid effectiveness and generate
policy reforms that benefit both the donor and recipient. However\, recipi
ents often perceive such conditions to infringe on their sovereignty. How
does the public in recipient countries view requirements attached to devel
opment finance?
Richard Clark\, assistant professor of government a
t Cornell University\, presents co-authored research that addresses this p
uzzle. Clark and co-authors argue that individuals’ assessment of aid requ
irements is a joint function of their trust in their own government and th
at of the donor country. Analysis of data from the Afrobarometer survey se
ries as well as an original survey fielded in Kenya offer support for thei
r contentions.
For more information or to request accessibility
arrangements\, please contact Georgios Tsaoussis Carter (gtsaouss@syr.edu)
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR