BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.4//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:The Moynihan Institute’s\, East Asia Program presents&nbsp\;Dan
 iel J. Stephens from&nbsp\;University at Buffalo.Partly to support critici
 sms of the attention economy\, philosophers have recently begun to develop
  general frameworks for the ethics of attention. In this talk\, Daniel Ste
 phens makes the case that early Confucian ethics can make an important con
 tribution to these frameworks. Because the normative assessment of people’
 s attention allocations is informed by the attentional demands inherent to
  their ethical lives\, and because the finite nature of human attention pl
 aces limits on people’s ability to meet those demands\, Stephens argues th
 at an ethics of attention should explain how people ought to collectively 
 meet those demands. This means both that an ethics of attention should pro
 vide realistic\, collective expectations for how people allocate their att
 ention in attempting to meet those demands\, and that it should provide co
 llective practices that synergize these attempts. Stephens calls such a se
 t of collective practices a “social-attentional scheme” and proposes that 
 one goal of an ethics of attention should be to develop effective social-a
 ttentional schemes. He concludes by discussing a social-attentional scheme
  developed within early Confucian thought\, proposing ways that this examp
 le can help develop a contemporary ethics of attention.Daniel&nbsp\;Stephe
 ns&nbsp\;is assistant professor in the Philosophy Department at the Univer
 sity at Buffalo. Before joining the department at Buffalo\, he was assista
 nt professor of philosophy at Duke Kunshan University. His research focuse
 s on ethical theory\, political philosophy\, epistemology\, and issues in 
 ethics\, politics and the philosophy of language in pre-Han Chinese though
 t. His work has appeared in&nbsp\;Philosophers’ Imprint\, The British Jour
 nal for the History of Philosophy\, Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosop
 hy\, Philosophy East and West\, The Journal of Chinese Philosophy\,&nbsp\;
 and&nbsp\;Politics\, Philosophy\, and Economics.
DTEND:20261008T180000Z
DTSTAMP:20260922T024408Z
DTSTART:20261008T163000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:A Confucian Contribution to the Ethics of Attention
UID:RFCALITEM639256274483135776
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>The Moynihan Institute’s\, East Asia Progra
 m presents&nbsp\;<span style="background-color: initial\; font-family: var
 (--kendo-font-family\, inherit)\; font-size: inherit\; text-align: inherit
 \; text-transform: inherit\; word-spacing: normal\; caret-color: auto\; wh
 ite-space: inherit">Daniel J. Stephens from&nbsp\;</span><span style="back
 ground-color: initial\; font-family: var(--kendo-font-family\, inherit)\; 
 font-size: inherit\; text-align: inherit\; text-transform: inherit\; word-
 spacing: normal\; caret-color: auto\; white-space: inherit">University at 
 Buffalo.</span></p><p>Partly to support criticisms of the attention econom
 y\, philosophers have recently begun to develop general frameworks for the
  ethics of attention. In this talk\, Daniel Stephens makes the case that e
 arly Confucian ethics can make an important contribution to these framewor
 ks. </p><p>Because the normative assessment of people’s attention allocati
 ons is informed by the attentional demands inherent to their ethical lives
 \, and because the finite nature of human attention places limits on peopl
 e’s ability to meet those demands\, Stephens argues that an ethics of atte
 ntion should explain how people ought to collectively meet those demands. 
 This means both that an ethics of attention should provide realistic\, col
 lective expectations for how people allocate their attention in attempting
  to meet those demands\, and that it should provide collective practices t
 hat synergize these attempts. </p><p>Stephens calls such a set of collecti
 ve practices a “social-attentional scheme” and proposes that one goal of a
 n ethics of attention should be to develop effective social-attentional sc
 hemes. He concludes by discussing a social-attentional scheme developed wi
 thin early Confucian thought\, proposing ways that this example can help d
 evelop a contemporary ethics of attention.</p><p><strong>Daniel&nbsp\;Step
 hens</strong>&nbsp\;is assistant professor in the Philosophy Department at
  the University at Buffalo. Before joining the department at Buffalo\, he 
 was assistant professor of philosophy at Duke Kunshan University. His rese
 arch focuses on ethical theory\, political philosophy\, epistemology\, and
  issues in ethics\, politics and the philosophy of language in pre-Han Chi
 nese thought. His work has appeared in&nbsp\;<em>Philosophers’ Imprint\, T
 he British Journal for the History of Philosophy\, Dao: A Journal of Compa
 rative Philosophy\, Philosophy East and West\, The Journal of Chinese Phil
 osophy\,</em>&nbsp\;and<em>&nbsp\;Politics\, Philosophy\, and Economics.</
 em></p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
