BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.4//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:The Latin America Policy Process Research Initiative (LAPPRI) a
 ims to advance established and emerging policy process theories in order t
 o enhance scholarly understanding of policymaking in Latin America. The LA
 PPRI Research Seminar Series features scholars from around the world dedic
 ated to researching policy process dynamics across the region.Presenters:K
 arina Arias Yurisch (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile) and Karina 
 Retamal Soto (Universidad de Chile)Title:Networks of Prescribed Interactio
 n in Chilean Environmental GovernanceAbstract:Environmental policies incre
 asingly depend on coordination among multiple public agencies\, yet the co
 ordination they prescribe is rarely examined at the moment of design. Deco
 ntamination plans are a clear case. A single plan addresses diverse proble
 ms\, some with identifiable sources that authorities can target directly a
 nd others with diffuse sources whose resolution depends on many interdepen
 dent actors. We ask whether this difference leaves an imprint on how polic
 ies prescribe coordination. We argue that the nature of the problem shapes
  policy design\, because the instruments feasible for each problem carry r
 ules that define who must interact with whom and therefore produce distinc
 t architectures of prescribed coordination.&nbsp\;We examine this argument
  in two Chilean decontamination plans that govern different environmental 
 media\, the Villarrica Lake Basin Water Pollution Control Plan and the San
 tiago Metropolitan Region Atmospheric Prevention and Decontamination Plan.
  Using Institutional Grammar 2.0\, we decompose each plan into institution
 al statements and reconstruct multilevel networks of prescribed interactio
 n among public agencies\, among tasks\, and between agencies and the tasks
  the rules assign them. We then apply network motif analysis and multileve
 l Exponential Random Graph Models to compare the coordination prescribed f
 or identifiable-source and diffuse problems. In both plans\, coordination 
 is anchored in managing agencies\, while shared responsibility\, in which 
 coordinated agencies converge on the same tasks\, intensifies where source
 s are diffuse. Each plan thus rests on a common managerial backbone that a
 dds distributed convergence in proportion to the interdependence of each p
 roblem. The comparison across water and air suggests that the nature of th
 e problem\, more than the policy domain\, drives the coordination that for
 mal rules create. It also offers a way to anticipate the coordination dema
 nds placed on subnational actors.
DTEND:20261119T190000Z
DTSTAMP:20261029T025349Z
DTSTART:20261119T180000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:LAPPRI Research Seminar: Networks of Prescribed Interaction in Chil
 ean Environmental Governance
UID:RFCALITEM639288248296411660
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>The Latin America Policy Process Research I
 nitiative (LAPPRI) aims to advance established and emerging policy process
  theories in order to enhance scholarly understanding of policymaking in L
 atin America. The LAPPRI Research Seminar Series features scholars from ar
 ound the world dedicated to researching policy process dynamics across the
  region.<br></p><h3>Presenters:</h3><p>Karina Arias Yurisch (Pontificia Un
 iversidad Católica de Chile) and Karina Retamal Soto (Universidad de Chile
 )</p><h3>Title:</h3><p>Networks of Prescribed Interaction in Chilean Envir
 onmental Governance</p><h3>Abstract:</h3><p>Environmental policies increas
 ingly depend on coordination among multiple public agencies\, yet the coor
 dination they prescribe is rarely examined at the moment of design. Decont
 amination plans are a clear case. A single plan addresses diverse problems
 \, some with identifiable sources that authorities can target directly and
  others with diffuse sources whose resolution depends on many interdepende
 nt actors. </p><p>We ask whether this difference leaves an imprint on how 
 policies prescribe coordination. We argue that the nature of the problem s
 hapes policy design\, because the instruments feasible for each problem ca
 rry rules that define who must interact with whom and therefore produce di
 stinct architectures of prescribed coordination.&nbsp\;<span style="backgr
 ound-color: rgba(0\, 0\, 0\, 0)\; color: inherit\; font-family: inherit\; 
 font-size: inherit\; text-align: inherit\; text-transform: inherit\; word-
 spacing: normal\; caret-color: auto\; white-space: inherit">We examine thi
 s argument in two Chilean decontamination plans that govern different envi
 ronmental media\, the Villarrica Lake Basin Water Pollution Control Plan a
 nd the Santiago Metropolitan Region Atmospheric Prevention and Decontamina
 tion Plan. </span></p><p><span style="background-color: rgba(0\, 0\, 0\, 0
 )\; color: inherit\; font-family: inherit\; font-size: inherit\; text-alig
 n: inherit\; text-transform: inherit\; word-spacing: normal\; caret-color:
  auto\; white-space: inherit">Using Institutional Grammar 2.0\, we decompo
 se each plan into institutional statements and reconstruct multilevel netw
 orks of prescribed interaction among public agencies\, among tasks\, and b
 etween agencies and the tasks the rules assign them. We then apply network
  motif analysis and multilevel Exponential Random Graph Models to compare 
 the coordination prescribed for identifiable-source and diffuse problems. 
 </span></p><p><span style="background-color: rgba(0\, 0\, 0\, 0)\; color: 
 inherit\; font-family: inherit\; font-size: inherit\; text-align: inherit\
 ; text-transform: inherit\; word-spacing: normal\; caret-color: auto\; whi
 te-space: inherit">In both plans\, coordination is anchored in managing ag
 encies\, while shared responsibility\, in which coordinated agencies conve
 rge on the same tasks\, intensifies where sources are diffuse. Each plan t
 hus rests on a common managerial backbone that adds distributed convergenc
 e in proportion to the interdependence of each problem. The comparison acr
 oss water and air suggests that the nature of the problem\, more than the 
 policy domain\, drives the coordination that formal rules create. It also 
 offers a way to anticipate the coordination demands placed on subnational 
 actors.</span></p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
