BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs present:Gladys McCormick\,
  Associate Professor of History\, Jay and Debe Moskowitz Endowed Chair in 
 Mexico-U.S. Relations\, Syracuse UniversityMexico’s Open Secret: From the 
 Dirty War to the Drug WarIn this paper\, I explore the concept of dirty wa
 r\, as it was pioneered by the French in Algeria and later perfected in as
 sorted Cold War theaters throughout the world\, and apply it to the case o
 f Mexico. I argue that Mexico’s version of a dirty war started with the br
 utal crackdown of popular mobilizations on October 2\, 1968 and concluded 
 in 1982 when the government declared an amnesty of guerrilla members with 
 the certainty that it had already destroyed them. During this period\, mil
 itary and police\, at times collaborating as special forces\, detained\, t
 ortured\, imprisoned\, and disappeared suspected insurgents using a range 
 of counterinsurgency techniques drawn from the Cold War. I study these tec
 hniques and compare them to other cases of dirty wars in the region at the
  time\, including those in Argentina\, Brazil\, and Chile\, and use them t
 o illustrate how the government gradually “taught” citizens to accept the 
 ever-present culture of fear in their midst. These didactic elements of Me
 xico’s dirty war normalized and rendered permanent the weakening of the ru
 le of law\, which explains why impunity in today’s security crisis appears
  so profoundly intractable. Hence\, why I conclude this paper by laying do
 wn the particularities of a definition of a drug war that considers its an
 tecedents\, including patterns of collusion between the government and dru
 g trafficking organizations. In doing so\, I propose that the roots of tod
 ay’s drug war are to be found in how the government used the state of exce
 ption to legitimate its counter-insurgency actions during the 1970’s dirty
  war.&nbsp\;Sponsored by Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs and&nbsp\;So
 vereignty\, Order and ConflictFor more information\, contact Ryan Griffith
 s: rgriff01@syr.edu
DTEND:20191028T173000Z
DTSTAMP:20260513T115449Z
DTSTART:20191028T160000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Mexico’s Open Secret: From the Dirty War to the Drug War - SOC
UID:RFCALITEM639142556891596964
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs presen
 t:</p><p>Gladys McCormick\, Associate Professor of History\, Jay and Debe 
 Moskowitz Endowed Chair in Mexico-U.S. Relations\, Syracuse University</p>
 <p><br><b>Mexico’s Open Secret: From the Dirty War to the Drug War</b><br>
 In this paper\, I explore the concept of dirty war\, as it was pioneered b
 y the French in Algeria and later perfected in assorted Cold War theaters 
 throughout the world\, and apply it to the case of Mexico. I argue that Me
 xico’s version of a dirty war started with the brutal crackdown of popular
  mobilizations on October 2\, 1968 and concluded in 1982 when the governme
 nt declared an amnesty of guerrilla members with the certainty that it had
  already destroyed them. During this period\, military and police\, at tim
 es collaborating as special forces\, detained\, tortured\, imprisoned\, an
 d disappeared suspected insurgents using a range of counterinsurgency tech
 niques drawn from the Cold War. I study these techniques and compare them 
 to other cases of dirty wars in the region at the time\, including those i
 n Argentina\, Brazil\, and Chile\, and use them to illustrate how the gove
 rnment gradually “taught” citizens to accept the ever-present culture of f
 ear in their midst. These didactic elements of Mexico’s dirty war normaliz
 ed and rendered permanent the weakening of the rule of law\, which explain
 s why impunity in today’s security crisis appears so profoundly intractabl
 e. Hence\, why I conclude this paper by laying down the particularities of
  a definition of a drug war that considers its antecedents\, including pat
 terns of collusion between the government and drug trafficking organizatio
 ns. In doing so\, I propose that the roots of today’s drug war are to be f
 ound in how the government used the state of exception to legitimate its c
 ounter-insurgency actions during the 1970’s dirty war.&nbsp\;</p><p>Sponso
 red by Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs and&nbsp\;Sovereignty\, Order 
 and Conflict</p><p>For more information\, contact Ryan Griffiths: rgriff01
 @syr.edu</p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
