BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:PUBLISH
PRODID:-//Telerik Inc.//Sitefinity CMS 15.1//EN
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Eastern Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:20251102T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=1SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=11
TZNAME:Eastern Standard Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:20250301T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYDAY=2SU;BYHOUR=2;BYMINUTE=0;BYMONTH=3
TZNAME:Eastern Daylight Time
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DESCRIPTION:Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs&nbsp\;Comparative Politics
  and International Relations presentsAfrica’s Democratic Outliers: Success
  Amid Challenges&nbsp\;in Benin and South AfricaSub-Saharan Africa arguabl
 y poses some of the most challenging\nconditions for democratic emergence 
 and survival.&nbsp\; According to our\nexisting theories\, this is due to 
 a number of structural conditions: low levels\nof economic development and
  industrialization\; regions of natural resource\nextraction\; increasing 
 levels of inequality between political-economic elites\nand the masses\; l
 ow levels of state capacity related to colonial and\nneo-colonial predatio
 n\, and post-independence challenges to broadcast power\;\nmulti-linguisti
 c\, multi-racial\, multi-ethnic\, and multi-religious populations.\n&nbsp\
 ;Yet three decades of democratic endurance in significant\, key cases\nsug
 gest that the continent has much to teach us about how democracies maintai
 n\ndespite extremely challenging conditions.&nbsp\; This chapter explores 
 two\nmost-different cases – South Africa and Benin – with highly diverse c
 hallenges\nand yet strikingly similar pathways to establish and maintain d
 emocracy against\nall odds. In both countries\, extreme political\, econom
 ic\, and ideological\ncrises made incumbent elites perceive the need to co
 ncede their prior mandate\nfor dominant control.&nbsp\; These concessions 
 resulted in a bargain with rising\nopposition elites for security and futu
 re political inclusion.&nbsp\; In these\ncases\, opposition elites realize
 d significant benefits to stability and order\nthat could be had with incl
 uding the old regime in the new ruling coalition.\n&nbsp\;&nbsp\;Despite t
 he challenges of a racially or ethnically cleaved society\nin South Africa
  and Benin\, the democratic bargain was maintained through\nself-intereste
 d and embattled incumbents staring down the precipice and opting\nfor inst
 itutional compromise given the infeasibility of maintaining the status\nqu
 o and opposition elites’ preferences for maintaining economic and social\n
 order that they could inherit when allowing the incumbent some enduring ro
 le.Rachel Beatty Riedl&nbsp\;John S. Knight Professor of\nInternational St
 udies  Cornell University&nbsp\;Rachel Beatty Riedl is the\nDirector of th
 e Einaudi Center for International Studies and the John S. Knight\nProfess
 or of International Studies\, and a Professor in the Government\nDepartmen
 t at Cornell University.&nbsp\; Her research interests include\ninstitutio
 nal development in new democracies\, local governance and\ndecentralizatio
 n policy\, authoritarian regime legacies\, and religion and politics\,\nwi
 th a regional focus in Sub-Saharan Africa. Riedl is the author of two\nawa
 rd-winning books and has published in the Journal of Politics\, Comparativ
 e\nPolitical Studies\, Studies in Comparative International Development\, 
 African\nAffairs\, and American Behavioral Scientist\, among others.Click 
 here to registerFor more information\, please contact Simon Weschle\,&nbsp
 \;swweschl@maxwell.syr.edu or Daniel McDowell\,&nbsp\;dmcdowel@maxwell.syr
 .edu or to request additional accommodation arrangements\, please contact 
 Morgan Bicknell\, mebickne@syr.edu.&nbsp\;
DTEND:20210219T183000Z
DTSTAMP:20260512T081527Z
DTSTART:20210219T170000Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Africa’s Democratic Outliers 
UID:RFCALITEM639141561278935701
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:<p>Moynihan Institute of Global Affairs&nbsp\;
 </p><p>Comparative Politics and International Relations presents</p><p><st
 rong><br></strong></p><p><strong>Africa’s Democratic Outliers: Success Ami
 d Challenges&nbsp\;in Benin and South Africa</strong></p><p><br></p><p>Sub
 -Saharan Africa arguably poses some of the most challenging\nconditions fo
 r democratic emergence and survival.&nbsp\; According to our\nexisting the
 ories\, this is due to a number of structural conditions: low levels\nof e
 conomic development and industrialization\; regions of natural resource\ne
 xtraction\; increasing levels of inequality between political-economic eli
 tes\nand the masses\; low levels of state capacity related to colonial and
 \nneo-colonial predation\, and post-independence challenges to broadcast p
 ower\;\nmulti-linguistic\, multi-racial\, multi-ethnic\, and multi-religio
 us populations.\n&nbsp\;Yet three decades of democratic endurance in signi
 ficant\, key cases\nsuggest that the continent has much to teach us about 
 how democracies maintain\ndespite extremely challenging conditions.&nbsp\;
  This chapter explores two\nmost-different cases – South Africa and Benin 
 – with highly diverse challenges\nand yet strikingly similar pathways to e
 stablish and maintain democracy against\nall odds. In both countries\, ext
 reme political\, economic\, and ideological\ncrises made incumbent elites 
 perceive the need to concede their prior mandate\nfor dominant control.&nb
 sp\; These concessions resulted in a bargain with rising\nopposition elite
 s for security and future political inclusion.&nbsp\; In these\ncases\, op
 position elites realized significant benefits to stability and order\nthat
  could be had with including the old regime in the new ruling coalition.\n
 &nbsp\;&nbsp\;Despite the challenges of a racially or ethnically cleaved s
 ociety\nin South Africa and Benin\, the democratic bargain was maintained 
 through\nself-interested and embattled incumbents staring down the precipi
 ce and opting\nfor institutional compromise given the infeasibility of mai
 ntaining the status\nquo and opposition elites’ preferences for maintainin
 g economic and social\norder that they could inherit when allowing the inc
 umbent some enduring role.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Rachel Beatty Riedl&nb
 sp\;</strong></p><p>John S. Knight Professor of\nInternational Studies </p
 ><p> Cornell University&nbsp\;</p><p><br></p><p>Rachel Beatty Riedl is the
 \nDirector of the Einaudi Center for International Studies and the John S.
  Knight\nProfessor of International Studies\, and a Professor in the Gover
 nment\nDepartment at Cornell University.&nbsp\; Her research interests inc
 lude\ninstitutional development in new democracies\, local governance and\
 ndecentralization policy\, authoritarian regime legacies\, and religion an
 d politics\,\nwith a regional focus in Sub-Saharan Africa. Riedl is the au
 thor of two\naward-winning books and has published in the Journal of Polit
 ics\, Comparative\nPolitical Studies\, Studies in Comparative Internationa
 l Development\, African\nAffairs\, and American Behavioral Scientist\, amo
 ng others.</p><p><br></p><p><a href="https://syracuseuniversity.zoom.us/me
 eting/register/tJwod--przgjHtdET1K9-OTSro3H-vSF4XoH " title="Click here to
  register">Click here to register</a></p><p><br></p><p>For more informatio
 n\, please contact Simon Weschle\,&nbsp\;swweschl@maxwell.syr.edu or Danie
 l McDowell\,&nbsp\;dmcdowel@maxwell.syr.edu or to request additional accom
 modation arrangements\, please contact Morgan Bicknell\, mebickne@syr.edu.
 &nbsp\;</p>
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR
