Student works with Muslim Women to Demand Justice
-Caroline Neilsen, MA International Relations Student
“You can get a kilogram of apples for a lot of money, but a
woman you can get cheap,” said Shehnaz, an Indian Muslim woman I interviewed,
after recounting the story of how she was married at age eleven, then married
and divorced by three different men by the time she was 18. Her nose was cut
off by her second husband for raising protest when she found out he had taken a
second wife. Today, she and her seven children are beggars. All men gave her
divorce through “triple talaq”, a practice legal in India under Muslim Family
Law where a man can say “I divorce you” three times in a row at any time and
then his wife is summarily divorced and kicked out of the house. After a
divorce, she is rarely given financial support or legal claims to joint
property, unless she can afford a lengthy and expensive legal battle in the
Indian courts. Muslim women are statistically one of the poorest and most
uneducated populations in India. Only 10% of Muslim girls in India ever finish
high school.
I interviewed Shehnaz
and 32 other women during a semester-long internship in India with the National
Muslim Women’s Movement (Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan). I worked along side
Muslim women activists to carry out a campaign to ban triple, unilateral talaq
and reform the law to ensure fairer marriage practices for Muslim women. My
experience was made possible with support from Syracuse University’s South Asia
Center and the Foreign Language Area and Studies Fellowship. After studying
Hindi for a year oncampus, I spent three months in India in an intensive
language study program. I then stayed for an additional four months as part of
Maxwell’s graduate program in International Relations.
Knowing the local language enabled me to gain a deeper
understanding of complex issues which I previously knew nothing about. Under
current law, Muslim women marriages alone are governed by a mainly uncodified
Shariah law. This Caroline speaks to an audiance in India means that
patriarchal interpretations of the Quran made by a male-religious leadership
are defined as “Shariah,” while rights given to women in the Quran are quietly
ignored. The main strategy of the movement I worked with was to raise the
voices of Muslim women and argue that these patriarchal interpretations of
“Shariah law” are against the values of Islam. The women I worked with
undertook considerable personal risk for this type of activism. After one public
meeting, a fatawa (religious degree) was issued against us in the local
newspaper, a mob destroyed another activist’s home, yet another faced threats
to her children. The women were frequently called anti-Muslim and Mullahs told
them categorically that “God’s laws cannot be changed.” Another mullah
pointedly said to us that anyone talking about banning triple talaq is under
the influence Satan. Even so-called progressive thinkers told us that India was
not yet ready for this kind of change.
Despite the opposition, every day, I met women pushing
boundaries within their homes and communities–demanding change, serving as
legal mediators, speaking publically, and teaching other women about their
rights. As for myself, before coming to India, I honestly had not given much
thought to “women’s rights” thinking things were “pretty good.” I left India
with the imprint of women like Shehnaz and thousands of others on my mind and
am now committed to supporting women’s rights until there truly is birabri
(equality) and insaf (justice).